Dissertation prize winners 2002
|
Undergraduate winner: Iwan Basten, Southampton Institute
An Investigation into the impacts of a foreshore recharge on the Solent's
oyster populations
This study presents an investigation into the extent a foreshore recharge
proposal put forward by Associated British Ports (ABP) for Southampton Water
may affect the local native oyster (Ostrea edulis) populations in the Solent.
The use of Environmental Risk Assessment is becoming more common, however, the
use of such an assessment for an individual species is a new application. The
approach sets out to identify the significance of identified risks to oysters
from the recharge proposal. A literature review identified three areas of
importance within the Solent oyster fishery, and the background to the
foreshore recharge proposal put forward by ABP to mitigate impacts the proposed
container terminal at Dibden, is reviewed. The parameters that control the
health and mortality of oysters are identified. This has enabled a sensitivity
allocation to be made to the various impacts that the foreshore recharge was
assessed to have. Of the assessed criteria suspended sediments; oxygen
depletion and toxic contamination proved to be the most difficult to resolve,
partly due to ABPs incomplete and sometimes flawed assessment. The risk
assessment identified that sedimentation; oxygen depletion; and toxic
contamination are all significant issues. The private oyster fisheries of
Stanswood and Calshot Bay are the most vulnerable to recharge impacts due to
their importance to the Solent, and relative close proximity to the foreshore
recharge site. The research concluded that the proposed foreshore recharge
should not go ahead, as its impacts would be intolerably high to the Solent
oyster populations, and ABP have not justified its need or considered fully its
impacts. Alternatives are available, the option of trickle feeding sediment
should be looked as a viable alternative to the proposal. Thresholds levels
within the Shellfish Water guidelines should be applied to which ever final
option for which ABP obtain consent for.
Postgraduate: Sarah Wiggins, Centre for Environmental Sciences, University
of Southampton
Sustainable Management of the Medina Estuary
The term sustainability is increasingly applied to assess environmental
management. An extensive synopsis of the current concepts and practices of
estuarine management and sustainable development is provided. This research
uses a technique to examine the sustainability of estuarine management. Guiding
sustainable principles for estuarine management have been formulated and
incorporation of these principles into Estuary Management Plans has been
assessed. An intensive case study based on the Medina Estuary, Isle of Wight
was used to provide a detailed insight into the success of applying these
sustainable principles. To provide an overview of inclusion of the sustainable
principles, seven Estuary Management Plans were obtained and analysed. Further
information to accurately assess the application of the principles into estuary
management was required and telephone interviews were conducted. The literature
research and examination of the management plans enabled analysis of the
sustainability of estuarine management within the UK. The constraints to
sustainable estuarine management were identified and recommendations to improve
the current situation have been made. The majority of the Estuary Management
Plans apply all the guiding principles although a number of essential
guidelines are only partially incorporated into management. The concept of the
carrying capacity and minimum intervention is not consistently applied. Public
participation in estuarine management is inadequate and important
representatives are prevented from management decision-making. The research
found that management is significantly lacking resources and commitment. The
complexity of the legislation, policies and plans at all tiers of governments
and the multitude of responsible bodies is hampering sustainable management.
Resources are forced to be inefficiently allocated to integration instead of
conflict resolution, conservation and sustainable development. The lack of
statutory authority was found to be the fundamental constraint to sustainable
estuarine management.
